Tournament Report for:

Slava Mikahiluk No. 6
Feb 5, 2011
Sammamish, WA

TD:  Mikhailiouk

Rating report for Slava Mikhailiouk No. 6 Section 1

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Marlow, Alex           ETSD9241   400  1037/  3  W2  W3  W4  3.0
  2 Stambaugh, Jarrod      HSCGA724   587   633/ 14  L1  W4  W3  2.0
  3 Reeves, Jasen          HSCEJ921   574   560/ 14  W4  L1  L2  1.0
  4 Hattikudur, Adit       ETSCA391   400   400/  3  L3  L2  L1  0.0

Rating report for Slava Mikhailiouk No. 6 Section 2

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Shakhovets, Sasha      LMAF5802   945  1063/ 37  W3  W4  W2  3.0
  2 Stambaugh, Lucas       HSCK9835   786   915/ 12  W4  W3  L1  2.0
  3 Nagaraj, Kedar         EPIDG205  1073  1024/ 21  L1  L2  W4  1.0
  4 Banerji, Aakash        ETSA9954   928   864/ 27  L2  L1  L3  0.0

Rating report for Slava Mikhailiouk No. 6 Section 3

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Shaji, Karthik         ETSC9815   748   929/ 15  W3  W2  W4  W5  W6  5.0
  2 Caraway, Logan         BCSG3038   692   807/ 82  W4  L1  W5  W6  W3  4.0
  3 Nair, Akira            BCAD9842   548   618/ 13  L1  W5  W6  D4  L2  2.5
  4 Smith, Aiden           BCAC2854   666   655/ 10  L2  W6  L1  D3  D5  2.0
  5 Rajurs, Shiv           ETSCF701   797   697/ 12  W6  L3  L2  L1  D4  1.5
  6 Popa, Daniel           ETSCG345   747   578/ 12  L5  L4  L3  L2  L1  0.0

Rating report for Slava Mikhailiouk No. 6 Section 4

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Vetrivel, Karthic      CSMCG300   403   605/ 17  W4  W2  L3  W5  W6  4.0
  2 Verma, Manav           ETSBJ666   400   640/  5  W3  L1  W5  W6  D4  3.5
  3 Robinson, Zoe          ETSAJ036   420   537/ 10  L2  W6  W1  D4  W5  3.5
  4 Joshi, Rajit           ETSAB592   400   574/  5  L1  W5  W6  D3  D2  3.0
  5 Seshamani, Ashwath     BCAAF661   400   400/  5  W6  L4  L2  L1  L3  1.0
  6 Agrawai, Aadi          BCAAG385   400   400/  5  L5  L3  L4  L2  L1  0.0

Note: Tied score standings are resolved by the TD at the event. Results here might not be in tiebreak order.