Tournament Report for:

Groundhog Gambit
Feb 4, 2012
Spokane, WA

TD:  Stripes

Rating report for Groundhog Gambit Section ggk-3

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Mogensen, Dana         SGSD9874   545   709/ 14  W17 W13 D3  W4  D5  4.0
  2 Arthurs, Seth          JFPB9560   869   860/ 35  L7  W18 W16 W11 W3  4.0
  3 Robertson, Zachary     ARCDJ614   674   723/ 35  W12 W6  D1  W5  L2  3.5
  4 Adams, Holden          ARCDJ411   718   726/ 20  D14 W7  W9  L1  W8  3.5
  5 Field, John            SGSDG492   607   663/ 40  W20 W15 W8  L3  D1  3.5
  6 Thew, David            SGSCJ170   527   573/ 43  W10 L3  W7  L8  W14 3.0
  7 Gustafson, Alexandria  SGSDA481   453   564/ 25  W2  L4  L6  W17 W15 3.0
  8 Stenbeck, Aj           ARCDJ644   633   647/ 35  W22 W11 L5  W6  L4  3.0
  9 Morris, Sam            SGSA6660   553   573/ 20  D18 W14 L4  W15 D11 3.0
 10 Brown, Stella          SGSCJ553   400   462/ 10  L6  L12 W20 W21 W18 3.0
 11 Morris, Jack           SGSCA018   719   681/ 20  W16 L8  W12 L2  D9  2.5
 12 Rigutto, Isabella      ARCBF069   419   478/ 19  L3  W10 L11 W16 D13 2.5
 13 Longhurst, Thomas      FREB2202   481   484/ 14  W21 L1  D19 D14 D12 2.5
 14 Gustafson, Gabe        SGSBB625   431   443/ 15  D4  L9  W18 D13 L6  2.0
 15 Smith, Jordan          ARCDI885   469   463/ 20  W19 L5  W21 L9  L7  2.0
 16 Lubanski, Josh         SGSA8453   442   450/ 15  L11 W17 L2  L12 W21 2.0
 17 Gedicke, Wyatt         LSEC9013   400   408/ 14  L1  L16 W22 L7  W20 2.0
 18 Field, Catie           SGSB2641   400   400/ 18  D9  L2  L14 W22 L10 1.5
 19 Swanson, Jett          LSEC8295   400   438/  3  L15 W20 D13 U   U   1.5
 20 Morris, Travis         SGSBE495   400   400/ 18  L5  L19 L10 BYE L17 1.0
 21 Westerman, Emily       ARCB9675   400   400/  5  L13 W22 L15 L10 L16 1.0
 22 Poole, Paul            SGSBF496   400   400/  9  L8  L21 L17 L18 BYE 1.0

Rating report for Groundhog Gambit Section ggk6

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Johnson, Ray           NWCFA291   884   964/ 22  W17 W8  W2  W5  L4  4.0
  2 Wu, Ethan              SGSC9608  1022  1043/ 64  W13 W10 L1  W8  W7  4.0
  3 King, Kenny            NWCEI851   720   850/ 20  W14 L6  W12 W9  W5  4.0
  4 Arthurs, Daniel        JFPFH013   964   971/145  L11 W18 W13 W6  W1  4.0
  5 Casper, Torrey         NWCFG699   906   885/ 27  W12 W16 W9  L1  L3  3.0
  6 Ravasia, Tariq         SGSCJ803   860   865/ 79  W19 W3  L7  L4  W15 3.0
  7 Seleski, Nick          NWCFJ999  1143  1091/ 26  L8  W17 W6  W10 L2  3.0
  8 Murphy, Trevor         ARCGB116   693   762/ 39  W7  L1  W15 L2  W16 3.0
  9 Lewis, Shawn           ARCFI941   846   824/ 79  W15 W11 L5  L3  W12 3.0
 10 Longhurst, Nathan      FREG5491   754   775/ 15  W18 L2  W11 L7  W14 3.0
 11 Gedicke, Hunter        LSEFF166   628   628/ 29  W4  L9  L10 L14 W17 2.0
 12 Starkey, Grant         SGSFJ434   561   569/ 86  L5  W19 L3  W17 L9  2.0
 13 Heglin, Dano           ARCFB572   683   654/ 29  L2  W14 L4  L15 W18 2.0
 14 Sposito, David         ALTEJ993   400   582/  5  L3  L13 W18 W11 L10 2.0
 15 King, Skyler           SGSEF028   463   486/ 13  L9  BYE L8  W13 L6  2.0
 16 Galow, Noah            SGSEJ707   400   400/  7  BYE L5  L17 D18 L8  1.5
 17 Watson, Robert         ARCEG805   478   457/ 19  L1  L7  W16 L12 L11 1.0
 18 Bertone, Conrad        NWCEB766   400   400/  5  L10 L4  L14 D16 L13 0.5
 19 Garrison, Michael      NWCEF606   400   400/  2  L6  L12 U   U   U   0.0

Rating report for Groundhog Gambit Section ggk-12

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Lindh, Dane            DPHM9760   940  1022/170  W4  U   W5  W2  W3  4.0
  2 Verchota, Joseph       SGSJ4296   911   931/155  U   W3  W4  L1  W5  3.0
  3 Ravasia, Jehan         SGSIH643   688   694/150  W5  L2  U   D4  L1  1.5
  4 Lindh, Drew            DPMHD081   958   898/152  L1  W5  L2  D3  U   1.5
  5 Moeckel, Ethan         HDPHG370   700   400/  4  L3  L4  L1  U   L2  0.0

Note: Tied score standings are resolved by the TD at the event. Results here might not be in tiebreak order.