Tournament Report for:

Mikhailiouk Quds No. 1
Oct 18, 2014
Redmond, WA

TD:  Mikhailiouk

Rating report for Mikhailiouk Quds No. 1 Section q1

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Zhulenev, Max          SLDFI846  1265  1298/ 77  W2  W3  W4  3.0
  2 Sun, Connor            ETSEI866  1010  1069/ 53  L1  W4  W3  2.0
  3 Kovacs-szabo, Slater   LABJ6867   914   928/ 32  W4  L1  L2  1.0
  4 Shapiro, Michael       LMAE8875  1088  1011/ 75  L3  L2  L1  0.0

Rating report for Mikhailiouk Quds No. 1 Section q2

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Edwards, Jack          ETSDK302   881   863/ 18  W2  L4  W3  2.0
  2 Luanava, Rafael        LABE8360   580   698/ 24  L1  W3  W4  2.0
  3 Shur, Vanya            AUDF7579   701   678/ 24  W4  L2  L1  1.0
  4 Kannan, Ashwin         DISC7153   656   647/ 87  L3  W1  L2  1.0

Rating report for Mikhailiouk Quds No. 1 Section q3

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Bordenet, Drew         CHYI6043   952   962/  8  W4  W2  W5  W3  W6  5.0
  2 Icev, Fhilip           ETSEB717   400   513/ 13  D3  L1  W4  W6  W5  3.5
  3 Buehrer, Oliver        LABD5748   400   540/  5  D2  W5  W6  L1  L4  2.5
  4 Stanko, Lenka          LABHA869   700   460/  5  L1  L6  L2  W5  W3  2.0
  5 Fosler, Hunter         LABIK258   400   400/ 10  W6  L3  L1  L4  L2  1.0
  6 Baratam, Sai           LMAFK591   500   400/  5  L5  W4  L3  L2  L1  1.0

Rating report for Mikhailiouk Quds No. 1 Section q4

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 
  1 Agrawal, Ekaansh       BCAB6072   703   738/ 10  W4  W3  D5  W2  W6  4.5
  2 Siochi, Christian      LABCC610   400   568/  5  W6  W4  L3  L1  W5  3.0
  3 Molchanov, Maxim       CMCCH184   400   501/  5  D5  L1  W2  D6  D4  2.5
  4 Jayaswal, Naina        BCAAH652   400   435/  5  L1  L2  W6  D5  D3  2.0
  5 Vincent, Jacob         LMADI505   400   435/  5  D3  D6  D1  D4  L2  2.0
  6 Buckton, Kiera         LABCC496   400   400/  5  L2  D5  L4  D3  L1  1.0

Note: Tied score standings are resolved by the TD at the event. Results here might not be in tiebreak order.